Two findings from the pre-ready review, both verified:
- verify-rfc-format scanned raw lines, so an RFC quoting a Status line,
a banned heading, or the grandfather comment inside a fenced example
would false-positive. The content scans (duplicate Status, H2 headings,
banned headings, grandfather, legacy marker) now ignore fenced blocks;
the positional header-block checks stay raw. Verified: a fenced
'Status: implemented' + '## Plan' + grandfather quote inside a walked
RFC no longer trips the gate.
- The companion RFC's pre-format corpus counts were imprecise: 27
distinct Status spellings (reasons collapsed), not 'some fifteen';
nineteen implemented files carrying thirty proposal-era heading
occurrences, not 'over twenty files'; three English files (plus one zh
counterpart) with no status, not four.
0e29de459e