docs(ci): align Windows coverage capacity model

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.md
-2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.md: 956175c14a3166239f67e64a41b81d23717c6ded
-2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.zh.md: bfa7494615460b54ed3903a04720ed1b2a9dbf6a
+2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.md: a1a783df2a700eec5436abbb144849629bbecebc
+2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.zh.md: 42db5aa974c1d1dca6c6151d6c058f39571dcc59

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.md

@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ Every pull request also starts an ordinary independent `windows-native` job name
 
 The native job is deliberately absent from `all-checks-passed.needs` and does not use `continue-on-error`: the aggregate neither waits for it nor changes conclusion because of it, while the job retains its own unmasked result. Workspace build, production-site, and 100%-per-file coverage failures make the native job fail. Static, documentation, package, built-artifact, lint, and snapshot inventories run in the same job as observational gates: their failures remain visible without changing the native aggregate result because Linux owns their blocking verdict.
 
-The 16-core lane admits four concurrent outer gates. Workspace build and production-site validation start immediately. Instrumented and exempt-heavy coverage both wait for the complete build: the instrumented corpus includes packer assertions over built `lib/` output, while the exempt gate's temporary Oxlint contract probes must not race source compilation. Every observational gate waits for both coverage gates to settle, regardless of outcome, before entering an available slot; its own `needs` edges still require their predecessors to pass. This also keeps later static gates that create temporary contract files from racing either coverage scan. [In-job partitioned coverage](2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md) uses eight single-worker shards, while the exempt-heavy gate receives two workers from `DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS=6`, for about ten active coverage execution units after build. `publint` is capped at eight workers when the observational inventory starts. Every Vitest project uses forked workers because Node 24's CJS lexer fatal reproduced in shared worker threads on Windows and POSIX. Both coverage gates set Vitest's default per-test and polling budgets to 30 seconds because unrelated process, Git, SQLite, watcher, grammar, and static-gate fixtures can exceed 15 seconds only under the complete lane's concurrent Windows instrumentation. The SQLite busy-journal pacing fixture uses two injected busy results followed by success and observes the delay between attempts; it does not require a 50-millisecond open-relative budget to outlast concurrent schema setup. The script-only translation-pairing merge suite runs in the exempt-heavy gate because it imports only `scripts/` sources and child processes; V8 instrumentation contributes no threshold coverage there but magnifies Git-process latency. Lefthook concurrency fixtures retain their outcomes with 30-second case budgets and a 10-second process-ready probe, while the installer allows five seconds for a preempted lock owner to publish its record after exclusive creation. Directory-picker composition gives its debounced config write an explicit 15-second poll budget; workspace-context composition fixtures use a test-owned signal without an unrelated one-second deadline. These lane-scoped budgets preserve asserted outcomes, while the 120-minute job deadline still bounds a stuck run. The LSP sources and the ACL-sandbox sources remain in the Windows denominator: stub-based failure-path suites carry every in-process ACL-sandbox file to 100%, and only the runner entry stays excluded — it executes exclusively as a spawned child outside the instrumented run, its behavior pinned end-to-end by the runner suite. Narrow annotated V8 ignores cover only unreachable branches (peer-platform arms and lifecycle-unreachable guards), with their behavior tests retained on the owning platform.
+The 16-core lane admits four concurrent outer gates. Workspace build and production-site validation start immediately. Instrumented and exempt-heavy coverage both wait for the complete build: the instrumented corpus includes packer assertions over built `lib/` output, while the exempt gate's temporary Oxlint contract probes must not race source compilation. Every observational gate waits for both coverage gates to settle, regardless of outcome, before entering an available slot; its own `needs` edges still require their predecessors to pass. This also keeps later static gates that create temporary contract files from racing either coverage scan. [In-job partitioned coverage](2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md) uses eight single-worker shards, while the exempt-heavy gate receives two workers from `DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS=6`, for about ten active coverage execution units after build. `publint` is capped at eight workers when the observational inventory starts. Every Vitest project uses forked workers because Node 24's CJS lexer fatal reproduced in shared worker threads on Windows and POSIX. Both coverage gates set Vitest's default per-test and polling budgets to 30 seconds because unrelated process, Git, SQLite, watcher, grammar, and static-gate fixtures can exceed 15 seconds only under the complete lane's concurrent Windows instrumentation. The SQLite busy-journal pacing fixture injects two busy results followed by success under the normal busy budget and observes each inter-attempt delay, keeping schema-setup scheduling outside its timing assertion. The script-only translation-pairing merge suite runs in the exempt-heavy gate because it imports only `scripts/` sources and child processes; V8 instrumentation contributes no threshold coverage there but magnifies Git-process latency. Lefthook concurrency fixtures retain their outcomes with 30-second case budgets and a 10-second process-ready probe, while the installer allows five seconds for a preempted lock owner to publish its record after exclusive creation. Directory-picker composition gives its debounced config write an explicit 15-second poll budget; workspace-context composition fixtures use a test-owned signal without an unrelated one-second deadline. These lane-scoped budgets preserve asserted outcomes, while the 120-minute job deadline still bounds a stuck run. The LSP sources and the ACL-sandbox sources remain in the Windows denominator: stub-based failure-path suites carry every in-process ACL-sandbox file to 100%, and only the runner entry stays excluded — it executes exclusively as a spawned child outside the instrumented run, its behavior pinned end-to-end by the runner suite. Narrow annotated V8 ignores cover only unreachable branches (peer-platform arms and lifecycle-unreachable guards), with their behavior tests retained on the owning platform.
 
-The 16-core allocation is the measured capacity point for this inventory. Six-worker coverage trials produced complete passes in 6 minutes 27 seconds and 7 minutes 50 seconds, while exact-head trials with four, three, and two concurrent workers inside one instrumented Vitest process exposed unreliable fixtures and worker exits. Separate single-worker child processes retain process isolation. Sixteen-shard samples reduced instrumented coverage to 112.66–122.01 seconds, but used the whole host before the exempt, build, and site work was counted; eight shards deliberately trade some latency for headroom. A 32-core comparison reduced aggregate gate time by only 1.47 seconds and still triggered the CJS-lexer fatal inside a fork worker, so additional cores did not provide a reliable wall-clock improvement.
+The 16-core allocation is the measured capacity point for this inventory. Six-worker coverage trials produced complete passes in 6 minutes 27 seconds and 7 minutes 50 seconds, while exact-head trials with four, three, and two concurrent workers inside one instrumented Vitest process exposed unreliable fixtures and worker exits. Separate single-worker child processes retain process isolation. Historical sixteen-shard samples reduced instrumented coverage to 112.66–122.01 seconds. Under the current post-build graph, sixteen instrumented shards plus two exempt workers would schedule eighteen coverage execution units on a 16-core runner before any production-site tail or system overhead; eight shards plus two exempt workers schedule ten. Eight deliberately trades some latency for that headroom. A 32-core comparison reduced aggregate gate time by only 1.47 seconds and still triggered the CJS-lexer fatal inside a fork worker, so additional cores did not provide a reliable wall-clock improvement.
 
 The first native run exposed two failures hidden by the compatibility lane. Documentation projection tests derived an image basename by splitting only on `/`; they now use Node's platform basename. Chokidar consumers received `%TEMP%` through the `C:\\Users\\RUNNER~1` 8.3 alias while libuv returned the long directory name, tripping its Windows event-path assertion. Shared settings and credentials watchers, plus Cordis module and exact-config HMR, now canonicalize the existing native watch base or deepest existing ancestor before opening the watcher and preserve a missing suffix, while file access and diagnostics retain the configured path. Module HMR attaches listeners and awaits the main watcher's ready event before plugin startup settles, so an immediate post-boot edit cannot race the initial scan. HMR acceptance derives expected identities through the same asynchronous native realpath operation, avoiding a synchronous Windows spelling that can retain the 8.3 alias.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-native-windows-pull-request-ci.zh.md

@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ Status: implemented
 
 原生作业被刻意排除在 `all-checks-passed.needs` 之外，且不使用 `continue-on-error`：聚合流程既不等待它，也不会因它改变结论；该作业则保留自身未被掩盖的结果。工作区构建、生产网站和逐文件 100% 覆盖率检查失败会使原生作业失败。静态检查、文档、包、构建产物、lint 与快照清单在同一作业内作为观测性门禁运行；其失败保持可见，但不会改变原生聚合结果，因为这些检查的阻断性判定由 Linux 负责。
 
-16 核通道最多同时运行 4 道外层门禁。工作区构建与生产网站验证会立即启动。插桩覆盖率与豁免重型覆盖率都等待完整构建：插桩语料包含针对已构建 `lib/` 输出的打包器断言，豁免门禁的临时 Oxlint 约定探针则不得与源码编译竞态。每道观测性门禁只等待两道覆盖率门禁以任意结果结算后再进入可用槽位；各门禁自身的 `needs` 边仍要求前置门禁通过。这也使随后创建临时约定文件的静态门禁不会与任一覆盖率扫描竞态。[job 内分区覆盖率](2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.zh.md)使用 8 个单 worker 分片，豁免重型门禁则从 `DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS=6` 获得 2 个 worker，因此构建完成后约有 10 个活动覆盖率执行单元。观测性清单启动时，`publint` 最多使用 8 个 worker。每个 Vitest 项目都使用 fork worker，因为 Node 24 的 CJS lexer 致命故障可在 Windows 与 POSIX 的共享 worker 中复现。两项覆盖率门禁都将 Vitest 默认的单测试和轮询时间预算设为 30 秒，因为在完整通道并发的 Windows 插桩下，多个互不相关的进程、Git、SQLite、watcher、语法和静态门禁 fixture（测试前置数据）可能超过 15 秒。SQLite busy-journal 节奏 fixture 会先注入两次 busy 结果，再返回成功，并观察尝试之间的延迟；它不再要求 50 毫秒的打开相对预算长于并发模式下的 schema 设置。translation-pairing 合并套件只导入 `scripts/` 源码和子进程，因此放入豁免重型套件门禁；V8 插桩不会为它贡献任何阈值覆盖率，却会放大 Git 进程延迟。Lefthook 并发 fixture 保留原有结果，采用 30 秒单用例预算与 10 秒进程就绪探测；安装器则允许被抢占的 lock 持有者在独占创建后用 5 秒发布记录。directory-picker 组合为防抖配置写入提供显式的 15 秒轮询预算；workspace-context 组合 fixture 使用测试自有、没有无关 1 秒截止时间的信号。这些只属于该通道的预算保留了原有断言结果，120 分钟的 job 截止时间仍会约束卡死的运行。LSP 源码与 ACL 沙箱源码仍计入 Windows 分母：基于 stub 的失败路径套件把每个进程内 ACL 沙箱文件都带到 100%，只有 runner 入口保持排除——它只作为 spawn 出的子进程在插桩运行之外执行，其行为由 runner 套件端到端钉住。窄范围且带注释的 V8 ignore 只覆盖不可达分支（另一平台专属分支、生命周期内不可达的防御守卫），其行为测试仍保留在所属平台。
+16 核通道最多同时运行 4 道外层门禁。工作区构建与生产网站验证会立即启动。插桩覆盖率与豁免重型覆盖率都等待完整构建：插桩语料包含针对已构建 `lib/` 输出的打包器断言，豁免门禁的临时 Oxlint 约定探针则不得与源码编译竞态。每道观测性门禁只等待两道覆盖率门禁以任意结果结算后再进入可用槽位；各门禁自身的 `needs` 边仍要求前置门禁通过。这也使随后创建临时约定文件的静态门禁不会与任一覆盖率扫描竞态。[job 内分区覆盖率](2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.zh.md)使用 8 个单 worker 分片，豁免重型门禁则从 `DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS=6` 获得 2 个 worker，因此构建完成后约有 10 个活动覆盖率执行单元。观测性清单启动时，`publint` 最多使用 8 个 worker。每个 Vitest 项目都使用 fork worker，因为 Node 24 的 CJS lexer 致命故障可在 Windows 与 POSIX 的共享 worker 中复现。两项覆盖率门禁都将 Vitest 默认的单测试和轮询时间预算设为 30 秒，因为在完整通道并发的 Windows 插桩下，多个互不相关的进程、Git、SQLite、watcher、语法和静态门禁 fixture（测试前置数据）可能超过 15 秒。SQLite busy-journal 节奏 fixture 会在普通 busy 预算内先注入两次 busy 结果，再返回成功，并观察每次尝试之间的延迟，使 schema 设置的调度时间不进入该断言。translation-pairing 合并套件只导入 `scripts/` 源码和子进程，因此放入豁免重型套件门禁；V8 插桩不会为它贡献任何阈值覆盖率，却会放大 Git 进程延迟。Lefthook 并发 fixture 保留原有结果，采用 30 秒单用例预算与 10 秒进程就绪探测；安装器则允许被抢占的 lock 持有者在独占创建后用 5 秒发布记录。directory-picker 组合为防抖配置写入提供显式的 15 秒轮询预算；workspace-context 组合 fixture 使用测试自有、没有无关 1 秒截止时间的信号。这些只属于该通道的预算保留了原有断言结果，120 分钟的 job 截止时间仍会约束卡死的运行。LSP 源码与 ACL 沙箱源码仍计入 Windows 分母：基于 stub 的失败路径套件把每个进程内 ACL 沙箱文件都带到 100%，只有 runner 入口保持排除——它只作为 spawn 出的子进程在插桩运行之外执行，其行为由 runner 套件端到端钉住。窄范围且带注释的 V8 ignore 只覆盖不可达分支（另一平台专属分支、生命周期内不可达的防御守卫），其行为测试仍保留在所属平台。
 
-16 核配置是这项清单经实测选定的容量规格。使用 6 个 coverage worker 的试验分别以 6 分 27 秒和 7 分 50 秒跑出完整通过结果，而在单个插桩 Vitest 进程内使用 4 个、3 个和 2 个并发 worker 的分支头精确试验暴露出不稳定的 fixture 与 worker 退出。相互独立的单 worker 子进程保留进程隔离。16 分片样本把插桩覆盖率缩短到 112.66–122.01 秒，但还未计入豁免、构建与网站工作就已经占满整台宿主；8 个分片刻意用部分延迟换取余量。32 核对比仅将聚合门禁时间缩短 1.47 秒，且仍在 fork worker 内触发 CJS lexer 致命故障，因此增加核心数没有带来可靠的墙钟时间改善。
+16 核配置是这项清单经实测选定的容量规格。使用 6 个 coverage worker 的试验分别以 6 分 27 秒和 7 分 50 秒跑出完整通过结果，而在单个插桩 Vitest 进程内使用 4 个、3 个和 2 个并发 worker 的分支头精确试验暴露出不稳定的 fixture 与 worker 退出。相互独立的单 worker 子进程保留进程隔离。历史上的 16 分片样本把插桩覆盖率缩短到 112.66–122.01 秒。在当前的构建后拓扑中，16 个插桩分片加 2 个豁免 worker 会在 16 核运行器上调度 18 个覆盖率执行单元，且尚未计入生产网站的尾部工作或系统开销；8 个分片加 2 个豁免 worker 则调度 10 个。8 个分片刻意用部分延迟换取这份余量。32 核对比仅将聚合门禁时间缩短 1.47 秒，且仍在 fork worker 内触发 CJS lexer 致命故障，因此增加核心数没有带来可靠的墙钟时间改善。
 
 首次原生运行暴露出两项被兼容性通道掩盖的故障。文档投影测试此前只按 `/` 拆分来派生图片 basename；现在改为使用 Node 根据平台计算的 basename。Chokidar 消费方收到的 `%TEMP%` 以 `C:\\Users\\RUNNER~1` 这个 8.3 别名表示，而 libuv 返回的是长目录名，导致其 Windows 事件路径断言失败。共享的设置 watcher 与凭据 watcher，以及 Cordis 的模块 HMR（热模块替换）与精确配置 HMR，现在都会在打开 watcher 前规范化现有的原生监听基准路径或层级最深的现有祖先路径，并保留尚不存在的后缀；文件访问和诊断仍使用配置路径。模块 HMR 会挂接监听器并等待主 watcher 的 ready 事件，之后插件启动才会完成，因此启动后立即发生的编辑无法与初始扫描形成竞态。HMR 验收通过相同的异步原生 realpath 操作派生预期身份，避免同步 Windows 路径写法仍保留 8.3 别名。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md
-2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md: 5552997c1b5a4d7554f49f2f6a806e93bd060f5d
-2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.zh.md: ac482efc8b938cf74c7f210b7c7d7419c277ee37
+2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md: 2cf06f6dd3eb9cdfd563aaa01ecd4ea9b8fb376f
+2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.zh.md: 266feed66a28833488973db66fbd1f3476bf9ba7

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ A normal failed test still emits a blob through `--coverage.reportOnFailure`, al
 
 `scripts/coverage-partitions.spec.ts` pins argument construction, package-script separator removal, one-worker partitions, the single merged threshold command, failed-test merging, failure diagnostics before complete-blob validation, waiting for sibling partitions after a spawn failure, and link-safe cleanup. `scripts/run-gates.spec.ts` pins opt-in selection, invalid-count rejection, both native Windows coverage gates' complete-build dependency, the complete Windows inventory with its blocking split, and unbuffered streamed output. React fake-timer cases that can move between partitions advance timers inside `act()`; geometry-dependent portal tests stub their element rectangles so a different shard schedule cannot turn deferred updates or jsdom coordinates into coverage-only failures.
 
-Completed native Windows comparisons measured two partitions near 405 seconds and sixteen partitions at 112.66–122.01 seconds, but the sixteen-way schedule could put more than twenty active execution units beside build and exempt coverage on a 16-core runner. Eight partitions keep separate-process isolation while accepting a longer feedback path for a materially lower peak. Two Linux samples measured the conservative two-partition configuration at 276.68 and 282.27 seconds; that configuration was stable but halved the ordinary path's four instrumented workers. Four partitions restore that fan-out, for six total coverage execution units on the 16-core hosted runner and at most 36 across the failover VM's six runner instances. These values come from completed runs or fixed capacity bounds; an unfinished run crossing an arbitrary elapsed-time mark is not evidence for increasing concurrency.
+Completed native Windows comparisons measured two partitions near 405 seconds and sixteen partitions at 112.66–122.01 seconds under the earlier gate ordering; those values compare partition latency, not the current peak. The current post-build phase runs eight instrumented partition processes beside two exempt workers, for ten coverage execution units. Sixteen partitions would raise that phase to eighteen before any still-running production-site work or system overhead. Eight keeps separate-process isolation while leaving capacity headroom. Two Linux samples measured the conservative two-partition configuration at 276.68 and 282.27 seconds; that configuration was stable but halved the ordinary path's four instrumented workers. Four partitions restore that fan-out, for six total coverage execution units on the 16-core hosted runner and at most 36 across the failover VM's six runner instances. These values come from completed runs or fixed capacity bounds; an unfinished run crossing an arbitrary elapsed-time mark is not evidence for increasing concurrency.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-18-in-job-partitioned-coverage.zh.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 `scripts/coverage-partitions.spec.ts` 固定了参数构造、包脚本分隔符移除、单 worker 分区、唯一一次合并阈值命令、失败测试合并、完整 blob 校验前的失败诊断、spawn 失败后等待兄弟分区，以及链接安全清理。`scripts/run-gates.spec.ts` 固定了显式启用、非法数量拒绝、两道原生 Windows 覆盖率门禁对完整构建的依赖、完整 Windows 清单及其阻断性划分，以及不缓冲的流式输出。可能在分区间移动的 React fake-timer 用例会在 `act()` 内推进计时器；依赖几何位置的 portal 测试会固定元素矩形，使不同分片调度不会把延迟更新或 jsdom 坐标变成只在覆盖率运行中出现的失败。
 
-已完成的原生 Windows 对比中，双分区耗时约 405 秒，16 分区耗时 112.66–122.01 秒，但 16 路调度与构建、豁免覆盖率并行时，会在 16 核运行器上形成超过 20 个活动执行单元。8 个分区继续保留独立进程隔离，同时接受更长的反馈路径，以显著降低峰值。两个 Linux 样本中，保守的双分区配置耗时 276.68 秒和 282.27 秒；该配置运行稳定，却把普通路径原有的 4 个插桩 worker 减半。4 个分区恢复这份并发，使 16 核托管 runner 上的覆盖率执行单元总数为 6，故障切换虚拟机的 6 个 runner 实例最多合计 36 个执行单元。这些数值来自完整运行或固定容量上限；运行尚未结束时跨过任意耗时刻度，不构成增加并发的证据。
+已完成的原生 Windows 对比中，双分区耗时约 405 秒，16 分区耗时 112.66–122.01 秒；这些数据来自先前的门禁顺序，只用于比较分区延迟，不代表当前峰值。当前的构建后阶段会让 8 个插桩分区进程与 2 个豁免 worker 并行，共形成 10 个覆盖率执行单元。若改为 16 个分区，则在尚未结束的生产网站工作或系统开销计入之前，该阶段就会达到 18 个执行单元。8 个分区既保留独立进程隔离，也为其他工作留出容量余量。两个 Linux 样本中，保守的双分区配置耗时 276.68 秒和 282.27 秒；该配置运行稳定，却把普通路径原有的 4 个插桩 worker 减半。4 个分区恢复这份并发，使 16 核托管 runner 上的覆盖率执行单元总数为 6，故障切换虚拟机的 6 个 runner 实例最多合计 36 个执行单元。这些数值来自完整运行或固定容量上限；运行尚未结束时跨过任意耗时刻度，不构成增加并发的证据。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案